Maybe they wont save the world, but they could sure help the economy.  First, let me start with what they are, HSA are a tax free savings account which can be used to pay for medical related cost.  High Deductible Health Plans are just like regular insurance, except much cheaper and with a higher deductible.  Using the two together, you can control the cost of insurance without sacrificing care.
Let me explain in a little more detailthe idea of health insurance is to protect you from the high cost of low occurrence activities, sure as a coma, or life threatening disease.  But, because typical insurance has low deductibles, many people use it to pay for normal doctor visits, or prescription drugs that they do not necessarily need (fun debate to have with people who use them).  It also removes the cost of not taking care of ones self, which commonly leads to diabetes, which is extremely expensive.  Before I get too far off subject, all of these little cost, and lack of effort of people to stay in shape has lead to more use of the medical system, which has increased cost.  Because people are pooled together, they do not pay cost directly, so there is little individual incentive to take corrective action.
To fix this, the government has allowed for Health Savings accounts.  If a person wants to take responsibility for their health, is willing to pay for the low cost doctor visits or prescription drugs, and wants coverage for the high cost low occurrence accidents this is perfect.  How it works is you and your employer pay your respective portions for health insurancebut unlike typical insurance, not all of it goes to premiums.  Because of the High Deductible insurance, premiums are less (this is because it does not pay for many of the low dollar items which make up a large portion of typical insurance claims).  The savings from the low premiums is then deposited into a Health Savings Account, which can be used to pay for the low dollar items.  Any dollars left over roll from year to year, and can be used for anything although a penalty is levied if not used for health cost.
This situation produces a very favorable outcome, people take responsibility for their health, use less of the low cost items which add up to be a majority of health cost, and are insured for any high cost health issue.  Wow, people will be healthier and the cost will go down.  It is amazing what happens when people are given responsibility for their actions.
We are what we are, humans act how they act, right or wrong, there is no reason to be idealistic and think people will change.  We are selfish and do what is best for us.

Similar posts: health savings account

Jessie spoke in a soft voice that gained in strength and articulateness as she went on.
“It’s these people, these Medievalists; you know, Lije. They’re always around, always talking. Even in the old days when I was an assistant dietitian, it was like that. Remember Elizabeth Thornbowe? She was a Medievalist. She was always talking about how all our troubles came from the City and how things were better before the Cities started.
“I used to ask her how she was so sure that was so, especially after you and I met, Lije (remember the talks we used to have), and then she would quote from those small book-reels that are always floating around. You know, like Shame of the Cities that the fellow wrote. I don’t remember his name.”
Baley said, absently, “Ogrinsky.”
“Yes, only most of them were lots worse. Then, when I married you, she was really sarcastic. She said, ‘I suppose you’re going to be a real City woman now that you’ve married a policeman.’ After that, she didn’t talk to me much and then I quit the job and that was that. Lots of things she used to say were just to shock me, I think, or to make herself look mysterious and glamorous. She was an old maid, you know; never got married till the day she died. Lots of those Medievalists don’t fit in, one way or another. Remember, you once said, Lije, that people sometimes mistake their own shortcomings for those of society and want to fix the Cities because they don’t know how to fix themselves.

Similar posts: herbal viagra reviews

If you have dry, itchy or scaly skin, then you probably have more lotions, oils and treatments than you can count sitting around your home. You have probably tried ointment after ointment, but many treatments actually exacerbate the problem.
Even if you have not actually been diagnosed with psoriasis, many people with extremely dry skin deal with the same symptoms that characterize this problematic skin condition and feel that they may never find a cure. Fortunately for you, there is a new way to attack the problem from multiple angles and potentially eliminate the issue permanently.
Psoriasis is a profoundly inconvenient, uncomfortable and embarrassing skin disorder. It affects somewhere between 1 and 2 percent of the population in a severe form, but experts estimate that many other people who believe that they simply have chronically dry skin may actually suffer from a mild form of the problem.
Psoriasis is characterized by itchy skin that actually peels off in scales, and it can appear almost anywhere on the body, making the affected areas red and even raw in some cases. There is no cure for psoriasis and few clinically proven treatments, as individual cases respond very differently to products intended to alleviate the symptoms.
Omega 3 oils have long been added to topical treatments for psoriasis. Recently, scientists have discovered that many stubborn cases of psoriasis respond even better to omega 3 fish oil treatments when the omega 3 is taken orally.
In the past, people have added game fish like salmon and tuna to their diets to treat everything from heart conditions to depression and chronic migraines. As a pleasant side effect, they found that their skin become smoother, more moisturized and less inflamed. With the addition of a daily supplement to their diet rather than the traditional “fish twice a week” method of getting additional omega 3, they found that their skin lost its scaly texture and – wonderfully – stopped itching!
If you suffer from psoriasis, then you should consider supplementing your current treatment with a healthy dose of omega 3 fish oil. You can get a daily, age-appropriate dose from a dietary supplement, which is far better than just eating lots of fish, which is less exact and also can expose you to traces of toxins and heavy metals that the FDA considers “safe” in game fish.
Furthermore, you will also reap the other benefits of getting sufficient omega 3 fatty acids, which include improved memory, increased mental acuity, cardiovascular health and general joint health.
Make sure that your supplement is made by a company with a zero-tolerance policy for traces of toxins and heavy metals in their fish oil, such as a product endorsed by representatives of the American College of Toxicology or the World Health Organization.

Similar posts: child health plus

It may be categorically said that companies that do not engage their sales force in professional sales training are leaving their businesses solely up to chance.It might sound clich?but admit it or not, business is better with professional sales training.
It may be categorically said that companies that do not engage their sales force in professional sales training are leaving their businesses solely up to chance. Beefing up a firm抯 sales team through proper training takes the guess work out of making a sale and equips the sales staff with the right attitude, skills and know-how to close big deals. It might sound clich?but admit it or not, business is better with professional sales training.
A company抯 sales department is the main engine that moves the business organization forward. Sales is the very essence of business, without which there would not be any business to speak of in the first place. Training up the company抯 sales team should be a top priority of business executives when it comes to the area of human resource development. Professional sales training therefore is a really significant contributor to the success of any business.
The performance of your sales team depends largely at how well they do their jobs utilizing the skills and knowledge that they possess. Anybody can attempt their hand at selling. However, not everybody can sell well all the time. Excellence in sales can be achieved through a professional sales training regimen designed to exercise the talents and faculties of your sales team throughout their professional careers.
Developing Proficiency in Sales
How can professional sales training benefit a business? With the implementation of best practices in sales training, proficiency in sales is developed towards fulfilling the goals of a company. This then delivers the kind of performance the enterprise needs from its sales team.
First a skills assessment sets an initial baseline to see where the salesperson is in terms of his or her proficiency in sales. After the course content for the training have been delivered, another assessment measures just how much the sales team member has learned from the training. Periodic assessments scheduled months after the training will show whether the lessons from the training have been retained and to see what other learning interventions may be needed for the next sales training sessions. This cycle of Assessment, then Training, then Implementation, then back again to Assessment creates a disciplined sales force in due time; one that can boost up the company with its growing performance.
Building Valuable Customer Relationships
Another best practice that merits highlighting insofar as sales force development is concerned is having a focus on building interpersonal skills. This is the glue that holds everything together and determines whether or not your sales team makes the deals that would really matter for the business. Excellence in sales hinges entirely on how the sales team builds on their relationships with the customers.
Professional sales training will help the salesperson to know the right questions, give the right answers, hone their negotiation skills and heighten their ability to close the deal. Nevertheless, going the extra mile of continuous improvement and maintaining valuable client relationships defines the professional sales training that would make a big difference for the business organization.

Similar posts: chelation therapy

There is something that men in their twenties need to take very seriously. But the problem is that Viagra is quite costly. I was unhappy and frustrated. Treating erectile dysfunction? Tell your doctor about sex may make you feel anxious or embarrassed. Each treatment has its own set of advantages and side effects. If you have had an allergic reaction to it in the past few years especially many people have taken their own medical care into their own hands the internet may of course play some part in this as people can research their own conditions and medications and feel more qualified to make their own decisions.

Similar posts: new drug levitra

Most people understand that its tough to recover from an addiction problem. In fact, many people think its impossible. But thats simply not true. Addiction, while a chronic and relapsing condition, is also very treatable. In fact, treatment and how people do in treatment is a much studied area. We know for a fact that treatment results in:
- Less criminal justice involvement,
- Less medical care usage and improved overall health,
- Less social service involvement,
- Increased employment,
- Decreased substance abuse.
We know that treatment works. We know that becoming involved in recovery support programs such as Twelve Step programs is a great help in a persons quest for sobriety. People in recovery will also tell you they need support from family, friends, co-workers, self-help groups and more. Treatment and recovery efforts save money, but more importantly, they save lives.

Similar posts: lipitor als

individual health insurance premiums will skyrocket, particularly with the addition of maternity coverage (previously only mandatory for group plans). However, the state's public health insurance assistance for financially-strapped pregnant women is currently funded with taxpayer money.

An estimated premium increase of .5% will not cancel out any relief taxpayers would feel by having fewer individuals needing state assistance for their medical needs. Based on 2007 premium averages, it would only mean a monthly increase of $1.30 for those that have purchased individual health insurance. The 5 million uninsured in California are unaffected by this legislation, and many of them must still utilize the Medi-Cal program.

While the newly passed bills herald great news for the currently insured, Schwarzenegger must now work to make individual health insurance affordable and available for every person that has been using state money for medical treatment.

Similar posts: health insurance quote

What the heck do you do with the toilet brush right after you use it? Hang it up? Lay it in the sink or bathtub to dry first? Or maybe you have one of those brushes with a built-in base that keeps the bristles corraled when not in use. All of these alternatives kinda skeenge me out, honestly, and whether it's realistic or not I have a kind of horror of loose toilet brushes and the germs I imagine growing on them. So I often find myself standing over the commode with a freshly-used toilet brush wishing I had some more sanitary place to put it. This is my Howard-Hughesian solution. A standard round plastic toilet brush is built into the lid of a barber's disinfecting jar, so that the lid forms a sort of "guard" for the brush when it is withdrawn for use.

Similar posts: physical therapy exercises

/ )
Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Non-recoverable failure in name resolution in /home/frank/data/www/newyorkpeoples.info/get/get.php on line 49

Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to ultimate_survey.paidsurveysbankroll.info:80 (php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Non-recoverable failure in name resolution) in /home/frank/data/www/newyorkpeoples.info/get/get.

Similar posts: child health plus

There are some side effects to this medication and some persons for whom it may not be as rigid or may require more direct stimulation to be achieved. There are some important Viagra precautions you should be able to revive their sex life by just popping a daily pill. Men who take Viagra should not exceed the recommended dose without checking with your doctor. It from a licensed pharmacy or have a prescription from your doctor will discuss your concerns and expectations, including why you're seeking help now for the problem, what you think the cause of your erectile dysfunction may soon be able to make love and have loving sex.

Similar posts: levitra los angeles

The internet offers great-sounding package deals to Mexico, the Philippines, Costa Rica, and Brazil, incorporating tours, resort stays, poolside pampering and plastic surgery all for one inexpensive price, often half the price or less than the same cosmetic procedures in the U.S. And because of the vast difference in price, medical tourism is on the rise. But is it safe to save that bit of money and have your breast augmentation, tummy tuck, face lift or liposuction abroad?
Choosing a Surgeon
To choose a plastic surgeon close to home, youd hopefully check his or her credentials and disciplinary record; research their education; make sure they are board certified by a reputable plastic surgery organization, such as the American Board of Plastic surgery; meet with the surgeon for at least one consultation; research the surgical facility; and repeat the entire process until you are satisfied you are choosing well.
Shopping abroad, the process can be a little more difficult, but there are tools that can help. The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery offers a surgeon-finder tool on their website listing surgeons in 73 countries who meet U.S. standards. But even with these tools, there are still questions to be answered and risks to consider.
The Consultation
Many surgical tourism patients dont meet with their doctors before the day of surgery. The consultation is the patients chance to gets a sense of the surgeon they are considering, explain what they expect from their surgery, have questions answered and voice concerns. It is also when a reputable surgeon gets a feel for the patient gets to know their expectations, medical history, and body type and begins to create a surgical plan. The consultation should be an early step in the evaluation process, not the last one before the procedure.
Recovery and After-Care
According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the activities that lure many have no place in plastic surgery recovery.
Vacation activities should be avoided after surgery. To properly heal and reduce the possibility of complications, patients should not sunbath, drink alcohol, swim/snorkel, water ski/jet ski, parasail, take extensive tours (walking or bus), or exercise after surgery.s important to remember that plastic surgery is real surgery, not a vacation activity. Be skeptical of any agency or clinic that plays up the or aspect.
The ASPS also warns of limited follow-up care included in many of these packages combined with the risk of infection and complications attributed to surgical vacations abroad. When complications arise, many patients are on their own. Long flights too soon after surgery is also a risk to watch out for. It can lead to swelling and infection, as well as blood clots and pulmonary embolism. Its advised to wait up to 10 days after surgery before flying home. Because of these factors, follow-up care offered by a package deal is an essential thing to consider before booking a surgery.
Unsatisfactory Results
A bargain is only a bargain if nothing goes wrong. The financial cost of revision surgery can far outweigh what the initial procedure may have cost in the U.S. It should also be noted that due in part to legal reasons, patients who have had cosmetic surgeries outside the U.S. may not easily find a reputable plastic surgeon at home to treat complications or perform the revisions they need.
For more information on cosmetic surgery, Conroe, Texas plastic surgeon Dr. Kim can answer you questions.

Similar posts: plastic surgery financing

Emory Neurological Surgery is among the nations leading departments for neurosurgical patient care, teaching, and research. The Department has highly specialized physicians and staff who array up|collaborate[/spin] together during the entire care process so that patients receive the best treatment throughout their recovery process. Such a means patients get the individualized care they deserve from referral to diagnosis to treatment and eventually to recovery. The neurosurgery array has a vast amount of experience regarding brain-related diseases and disorders and should be kept in mind for Brain Tumors Atlanta.
The Emory Department of Neurological Surgery offers both extensive research as well as top ranking education programs that are among the best in the world. As a national leader in neurological research, Emory neurosurgeons provide new insight and solutions into brain-related diseases and disorders and are currently working on innovative procedures and medications for their treatment. Brain Tumors, are an especially important topic. Unlike other institutions the physicians and scientists at Emory study all the possible causes and workings of specific neurological disorders in their aim to find more effective treatments for these conditions.
Emory neurosurgeons array up|collaborate[/spin] with oncologists at the Emory Winship Cancer Institute to perform procedures for nervous system tumors and neurological complications of cancer. In addition, Emory has developed a Brain Tumor Program Atlanta which is an ongoing clinical investigation into the specific causes and treatments of brain cancer. The Brain Tumor Program includes 12 basic and translational research investigators in neuro and radiation oncology from 11 different Departments, with 8 peer-review funded projects. The aim of the program is to assign molecular profiles to brain tumor types and thus potentially permit their early detection and prognosis. On top of Such a, the program aims to develop a leading center for basic, translational and clinical brain tumors.
Those suffering from Brain Tumors Atlanta, should seek treatment with The Clinical Neuro-Oncology Program at Emory Winship Cancer Institute. Such a program helps to treat patients with either brain or spinal cord tumors and functions as a multidisciplinary brain/spinal cord tumor clinic .The program has a array of professionals from many fields including neuropathology, neuroradiology, nuerosurgery, and neuro-oncology and laboratory scientists of the Winship Brain Tumor Program. Such a diverse array of specialists allows for fast translational research, and faster, more effective treatment. The Clinical Neuro-Oncology Program holds a weekly Brain Tumor Conference to discuss management of cases.

Similar posts: relaxation therapy

Democracy Now!

Thursday night, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri hosted the first and only vice-presidential debate between Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and Delaware Senator Joseph Biden. The debate was moderated by Gwen Ifill of PBS.

Senator McCain and Governor Palin have been sowing doubts about how fair Ifill will be because of a book shes writing thats called Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama. The McCain campaign and right-wing pundits allege that Ifill might be biased in favor of Senator Obama.

Whats missing, however, is any concern about the fairness of the very structure of the debate. The Obama and McCain campaigns jointly negotiated a detailed contract dictating the terms of all the 2008 debates. This includes who gets to participate, as well as the topics raised during the debates. But the contract remains a secret, and the Commission on Presidential Debates, a private corporation created by the two major parties, has refused to release the contract to the public.

AMY GOODMAN: Open Debates is a nonprofit committed to democratizing the presidential debate process. Last month, Open Debates and nine other pro-democracy groups called on the Commission to make the contract public.

George Farah is the founder and executive director of Open Debates, author of No Debate: How the Republican and Democratic Parties Secretly Control the Presidential Debates, joining us from Washington, D.C.

So, George, well, what are these rules tonight? What will they abide by, and who is making them?

GEORGE FARAH: Unfortunately, Amy, we dont know the extent of the rules, because, precisely because, the Obama and McCain campaigns have absolutely refused to release the detailed contract that dictates the terms of tonights debate. We only have limited knowledge.

With respect to the new rules that we do know about, because the campaigns are terrified that both Biden and Palin will make a major gaffe during tonights performance, they have severely restricted the response times, so each candidate only has ninety seconds to respond to a particular question and then, only two minutes afterwards, to have some sort of discussion. This is in sharp contrast to the amount of time that was given to Obama and McCain during their debate.

And, of course, Amy, youre not going to see any third party voices in tonights debate. The Republican, Democratic parties, who exert near absolute control over these public forums, have determined and made sure that no third party voices are ever seen on the debate stage and can challenge their dominance of our political system.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, walk us through how we got to this stage, who originally was sponsoring these debates years back, and how this secretive nonprofit organization gained control of them.

GEORGE FARAH: We used to have a fantastic, genuinely nonpartisan presidential debate sponsor: the League of Women Voters. From 1976 until 1984, the League of Women Voters hosted our most important public forums, and they made sure the debates served the public interest rather than the interest of any political party. And they had the guts to stand up to the two major parties.

In 1980, for example, former Republican Congressman John Anderson ran as an Independent for the president of the United States. President Jimmy Carter adamantly refused to debate him, but the League said, You know what, Mr. President? Too bad. And they hosted a presidential debate between Ronald Reagan and John Anderson that was watched by over 40 million people.

Fast-forward four years later, the Walter Mondale and Ronald Reagan campaigns actually vetoed sixty-eight of the moderators that the League of Women Voters had proposed for the three debates. What did the League do? They issued a scathing public press release castigating the candidates for abusing the process, and the Reagan and Mondale campaigns were forced to accept aggressive moderators.

Again, four years later, the League of Women Voters were refusing to implement any contract that was negotiated by the George Bush and Dukakis campaigns. They had negotiated the first secret contract, a twelve-page memoranda of understanding, that dictated who would participate and how the format would be structured. The League said, This is an outrage!

AMY GOODMAN: You mean that that was longer than the initial proposal for the $700 billion bailout?

GEORGE FARAH: Nine pages longer. And they absolutely refused to implement the contract. Well, guess what. The parties did not like the fact that an uppity womens organization, pro-democracy, was telling their boys who could participate in their debates and under what condition. And so, in 1987, they created this private corporation called the Commission on Presidential Debates. It sounds like a government agency; its not. And every four years, it awards absolute control to the Republican and Democratic parties over our political forums.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And who sponsors this organization?

GEORGE FARAH: Well, that makes things even worse. Unfortunately, much of the money that finances the presidential debates that are hosted by the Commission on Presidential Debates are private corporations that have regulatory interests before Congress. Anheuser-Busch has spent the most money of any company in the United States on presidential debates, which is partly why every four years we get a debate in St. Louis, and we dont have a debate this year in New Orleans, which is dying for a debate, and massive civic groups were demanding that a debate be held there to highlight some of Katrinas problems.

Another consequence of corporate sponsorship is that the corporations are able to give a contribution this way to both parties. You know, we have limitations in this country. Corporations cant give direct contributions to the candidates. Well, the Commission provides an end-run around. When a corporation gives money to the Commission on Presidential Debates, it knows it is giving money to both the Republican and Democratic parties, supporting their duopoly over our political process and excluding third party voices that may be hostile to corporate power. And all four third party candidates that are on ballots this year are sharply critical of growing corporate power.

AMY GOODMAN: Who are the co-chairs of the Commission?

GEORGE FARAH: Well, youve got Frank Fahrenkopf and Paul Kirk. These guys have run this presidential debate process for twenty years. They first incorporated in 1988. At the time, Amy, they were the heads of the Republican and Democratic parties. And they stillthey still run our presidential debates.

And it shouldnt be surprising that these guys are willing to sacrifice the integrity of the political process to serve partisan or private interest, because theyre registered lobbyists. Paul Kirk has lobbied on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry. And Frank Fahrenkopf is the nations leading gambling lobbyist; he is the president of the American Gaming Association. These are the guys deciding who gets to participate in the most important political forums in the United States of America.

JUAN GONZALEZ: But now, there have been occasions when a third party candidate did get in. Obviously, Ross Perot managed to get in some of the debates back in 92. Now, what have they been doing in terms of that?

GEORGE FARAH: Well, Juan, in 1992, the only reason Ross Perot got in the presidential debates is because the candidates refused to exclude him. Thats it. If the candidates had wanted him out, if Bill Clinton had wanted him out, he would have been out.

Four years later, though, when Ross Perot ran again, he was polling exactly the amount he was polling prior to the debates in 1992; he was polling at nine percent. He had $36 million in taxpayer funds. And yet, he was excluded. Why? Because behind closed doors, Bill Clinton and Bob Dole struck a deal.

Bill Clinton agreed to exclude Perot as long as Bob Dole agreed that there would be only two debates instead of three debates, that they would abolish follow-up questions, and that they would schedule those debates opposite the World Series. Bill Clinton was winning by about twenty points in the polls, and he didnt want anyone watching these debates or any difficult questions challenging his authority.

And thats exactly what happened. Perot was excluded, despite $35 million in taxpayer funds. The debates were held opposite the World Series, resulting in the lowest viewership ever. No follow-up questions. Only two debates. And the American people had no idea, because the Commission on Presidential Debates secretly implemented the contract and took all the flak.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to look how the two major party presidential nominees talk about the financial crisis and the Treasurys $700 billion bailout and how the third party candidates address the issue. Lets begin with an excerpt from the first presidential debate last Friday between Senator McCain and Senator Obama.

SEN. BARACK OBAMA: Number one, weve got to make sure that weve got oversight over this whole process. $700 billion potentially is a lot of money. Number two, weve got to make sure that taxpayers, when they are putting their money at risk, have the possibility of getting that money back and gains if the market and when the market returns.

SEN. JOHN McCAIN: We have finally seen Republicans and Democrats sitting down and negotiating together and coming up with a package. This package has transparency in it, options for loans to failing businesses, rather than the government taking over those loans. We have toit has to have a package with a number of other essential elements to it.

AMY GOODMAN: So, the two major presidential party candidates agree on the bailout. Now, lets listen to some of the other presidential candidates who were not included in Fridays debate, what they had to say about the bailout. This is Libertarian presidential nominee Bob Barr.

BOB BARR: Now we have the federal government, the Bush administration, coming to us, the taxpayers of this country, and saying, We want you to bail us out of the problem that weve created over the last ten years. You open the door to this, you throw open wide the barn doors here, this raid on the federal Treasury, this raid on the taxpayers of this country, youll know for a fact that it will happen again and again and again. Already, others are lining up. The automobile industry is already lining up for its bailout. The Republican and the Democratic parties are complicit not only in causing this problem through their bad policies, their bad legislation, but also in proposing this bogus solution to the problem.

AMY GOODMAN: Thats Bob Barr, Libertarian candidate for president. We also interviewed Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader last week. This is some of what he had to say.

RALPH NADER: Its not clear at all why a bailout is needed. Thats part of the stampede in the pack and the panic that Bush and Paulson and Bernanke are pushing Congress toward. You know, its eerily reminiscent, when you listen to Bush yesterday, of how he stampeded the Congress and the country into the criminal war invasion of Iraq in 2003. I mean, look at all his statements: this could do this, this would do that, farms failing, small business, tada, tada. The first question we have to ask as citizens is, why is there a need for a bailout?

AMY GOODMAN: Thats Ralph Nader. And finally, this is Green Party presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney talking about the bailout.

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: First of all, we need a moratorium on foreclosures. Secondly, we need to renegotiate all adjustable-rate mortgages into thirty- or forty-year loans. We also need to make sure that we redefine credit so that credit can work for small business owners and individuals and not against them. We also need accountability in the systemopenness, transparency and accountability.

AMY GOODMAN: George Farah, it sounds like it would be a very different debate about the most important issues of the day, if these third party candidates were included.

GEORGE FARAH: Absolutely, Amy. Thank you so much for highlighting the significance of third party inclusion. There is no doubt that often the Republican and Democratic parties take positions, in large part due to the corporate interests that finance their campaigns, that are directly at odds with the opinions of either the majority of Americans or tens of millions of Americans. And these debates, which are designed to inform voters so they can make substantive decisions, should be airing the ideas that are supported by the vast majority of Americans that the two major parties are excluding.

And historically, that is the role that third parties have played. Historically, it has been third parties, not the major parties, that have supported and are responsible for the abolition of slavery, womens suffrage, public schools, public power, unemployment compensation, minimum wage, child labor laws. The list goes on and on. The two parties fail to address a particular issue; a third party rises up, and its supported by tens of millions of Americans, forcing the Republican and Democratic parties to co-opt that issue, or the third party rises and succeeds, which is why the Republican Party jumped from being a third party to being a major party of the United States of America.

When you exclude third parties from the election process, third parties that the vast majority of Americans would like to see in the presidential debates, youre not only denying those people the right to choose who they want to run for president and who they want to vote for, but youre denying the very fundamental and critical issues that, in a generative democracy, we need to have aired in from of tens of millions of voters.

AMY GOODMAN: George Farah, I want to thank you for being with us. Your website?

GEORGE FARAH: Opendebates.org. Id appreciate if if everyone took a peek at it. Thank you.

Similar posts: after gallbladder surgery